Q:
Why are small to medium-sized businesses inundated with interfering,
meddling bureaucrats, seemingly intent on slowing down the growth of commerce
whilst banks, insurance and mortgage companies appear to have been given
licence to plunder, misrepresent and steal?
Q: How have huge multinationals been allowed openly to
use bribes and avoid the taxation levels that are imposed on the average tax
payer, securing immunity from any liability or prosecution when caught out?
Q: Why have the bankers who have brought the majority of
average Britons to their knees, financially speaking, been allowed to pocket
£17billion on ‘bonuses gained’ via this debacle?
Q: Why does the government of Great Britain expect
taxpayers to cover the shortfall in government finance caused by bailing out
the banks with said taxpayers’ money so that taxpayers will have paid for this
action twice over?
Q: Why have Britons allowed so many of their liberties to
be eroded in the name of anti-terrorism when everybody knows that the threat
of terrorism was whipped up by the very politicians who are using it as
leverage to excuse the constant increase of surveillance and intrusion into
the affairs of perfectly ordinary law-abiding citizens?
Q: Why are Britons willing to contemplate the spending of
£9 billion on a project to monitor every piece of Internet traffic in
existence when it is perfectly obvious that this is not necessary or desirable
and that it has long been a perfectly simple matter to ‘tap’ computer
communications just like telephone communications?
Q: Why are Britons expected to believe that monitoring
computer activity will make any difference whatsoever to the real or imagined
terrorist threat when it is perfectly clear that known and would-be terrorists
are already being allowed to live on handouts from the tax payer with
impunity?
Q Is all this activity involving increased surveillance
whilst taking no action when wrong-doing is uncovered a case of human rights
for terrorists but none for the innocent population of Britain?
Q: Why is it possible for a National
Black Police Association to exist when anyone trying to form a National White
Police Association would, correctly, be accused of racism? Surely such a group
is divisive and should never have been allowed to come into existence -
anything of this ilk that is not open to all should be considered
unacceptable, regardless of which race is being promoted or rejected, surely?
Q: Why is it acceptable for there to be
'Gay' and 'Lesbian' organisations when a 'Heterosexual' organisation would be
accused of divisiveness?
Q: Why is so much of the funding produced
by taxpayers and lottery entrants allotted, awarded and directed to tiny
minority groups, many of which are entirely without merit and have been formed
specifically to try and obtain money for nothing, when there are so many
nationally important projects desperate for finance?
Q: Why do our leaders see fit to
interfere in situations where anyone with real knowledge of international
affairs could have told them they would never succeed and yet wilfully ignore
shocking abuses in countries where Great Britain might still be said to have
some capacity for exerting influence?
Q: Why do the current crop of active politicians appear
unaware that they may well be driving the population of Great Britain into the
arms of whatever fascist regime is waiting quietly to erupt at the next
general election, as though what we have been seeing happen around Europe could be
ignored instead of taken as a grim warning?
These I believe to be pertinent questions and I would
love to hear some answers from those who live at the expense of taxpayers and
purport to be the ‘leadership’ of Great Britain.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Those who have known Mr. Rantankerous for any length of time may remember
ridiculing him for his diatribes about the direction being taken by Great
British institutions including the police, banks, insurance companies,
mortgage brokers and especially politicians, as far back as 1977. It gives him no pleasure whatsoever (well,
maybe just a little) to be able to say "I told you so." | 
